Aron Ra has finally become a Rock Atheist (RA). What is a Rock Atheist you ask? Well, specifically a RA is someone who believes that rocks are atheist, but RA’s …[read more]
Category: 3 AM Philosophy
Agree to Argue: Reasons To Believe’s new show I’m a co-host of!
It’s finally here! A year in the making. Agree to Argue. A new show by Reasons to Believe (Dr. Hugh Ross’s organization) on a new channel premiers July 8th 11 …[read more]
The basics of the Laws of Logic
The basics of the Laws of Logic It is almost an inevitability that in any discussion with a person engaging in presuppositional apologetics that the phrase “the Laws of …[read more]
Gumballs and God better explained
During many discussions on epistemology it is often brought up to me the analogy of a gumball machine to give an example as where by if you don’t accept a …[read more]
An open letter to Matt Dillahunty from the Atheist Experience
https://clips.twitch.tv/GloriousRespectfulRutabagaTBTacoLeft An open letter to Matt Dillahunty: Matt Dillahunty…you are wrong. I politely ask you to please stop lying about me. You have continually lied about my positions for 2 …[read more]
I’m not atheist nor theist (Change my mind) Matt Dillahunty edition
Matt Dillahunty has said on the Atheist Experience that it is impossible for someone to neither be atheist nor theist…and yet here I am…neither atheist nor theist. Matt has what …[read more]
Dr. Alex Malpass and Dr. William Lane Craig’s argument over countable infinities and modal scope fallacy.
I spoke with Dr. Alex Malpass a bit about his debate with Dr. William Lane Craig (WLC) and the charge of a modal scope fallacy. I am going to naively …[read more]
Does answering “I don’t know” actually answer a direct question?
Does answering “I don’t know” actually answer a direct question? Recently in discord, yes I was actually hanging out in discord, I was talking to someone who answered “I don’t …[read more]
Breaking logic: Playing with Modal logic. (False conclusions from valid and sound arguments?)
For me modal logic is extremely complicated and I think far more recondite than most other forms of logic. However, even with my exceptionally little understanding of the basics of …[read more]
If ~Bp is held as atheism, then ~B~p can be held as theism else you are guilty of special pleading.
“Weak Atheist Special Pleading Argument” (WASP argument) I wanted to see if I could simplify my atheist special pleading argument because people have once again been talking about it. This …[read more]
