Late night ponderings:   First, I do personally think atheism as “lack of belief” seems to have an implicature that one is missing something, and that *if* someone is going …[read more]

It would seem some greater elucidation is required to explain more specifically why the phrase “agnostic atheist” in the weak case is nonsensical (and superfluous in the strong case). I …[read more]

TRIGGER WARNING: DO NOT read this if ALL you plan to do is BITCH about the topic as people who are not understanding the argument seem to be just having …[read more]

One thing I like to do is try to break shit. I’m actually kinda good at it. As a kid I was very good at taking things apart, but not …[read more]

Ernest Sosa in his paper “The Raft and the Pyramid: Coherence versus Foundations in the Theory of Knowledge”  makes a distinction between a “normative and evaluative” justification and an epistemic justification by …[read more]

Do atheist and non-believers make a mistake when discussing morality to allow theist to concentrate on meta-ethics (what makes something ethical), moral epistemology (how do we know what is moral) …[read more]

Example of a “married bachelor”: Someone from a FB group had asked me to give an example of how even the most sacred things can be challenged, even things we …[read more]

Agnosticism, atheism, theism and LOGIC 101:   p V ~p   p is a proposition “V” means OR ~p is the negation of the proposition   This is called a …[read more]